ARISE

Advancing Research & Innovation in STEM Education of Preservice Teachers in High-Needs School Districts

NSF
  • Home
  • About
    • About ARISE
    • ARISE Evaluation
    • ARISE Advisory Board
    • ARISE Team
    • About AAAS
    • About NSF
  • Blog
    • 2026 Call for ARISE Blog Submissions
  • What’s New?
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Commissioned Papers
    • ARISE Webinars
    • NSF Proposal Preparation Webinars
    • Bibliography
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Promising Practices
    • ARISE Convenings
      • Upcoming Meetings & Presentations
      • Past Meetings & Presentations
        • Noyce Regional Dialogues
    • Helpful Links
  • Opportunities
    • Submit an Evidence-Based Innovation
      • ARISE Evidence-Based Innovation Guidelines
    • Submit a Research Article/Report
    • Submit a Proposal for a Virtual Workshop
    • Grants
    • Dissemination
    • Professional Development Opportunities
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
ARISE / Teacher Professional Development Programs Integrating Science and Language with Multilingual Learners

Teacher Professional Development Programs Integrating Science and Language with Multilingual Learners

October 3, 2023 by Betty Calinger

By: Okhee Lee, Ph.D., Professor, New York University
Scott E. Grapin, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, University of Miami
Alison Haas, Ph.D., Director of Development and Implementation, SAIL Research Lab, New York University

Picture of elementary school students
Students discussing their model. Credit: NYU SAIL Research Lab

A Framework for K-12 Science Education (National Research Council, 2012) served as the foundation for the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS; NGSS Lead States, 2013a). During the past decade, 20 states and the District of Columbia adopted the NGSS, and 28 additional states developed their own standards based on the Framework. The NGSS are expected of all students, hence “all standards, all students” with a focus on equity (NGSS Lead States, 2013b).

In the NGSS science classroom, student agency is at the center, as students make sense of phenomena in science and design solutions to problems in engineering. But how can educators ensure all students experience the agency that the standards are intended to promote, especially minoritized student groups, such as multilingual learners? These students include both recently arrived students, who are learning English as a new language, as well as U.S.-born English learners, who represent more than half of students currently classified as “English learners” in U.S. public schools (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine, 2018).

In this blog, we describe our professional development (PD) program with elementary science teachers, which is grounded in contemporary conceptions of science learning, language learning, and science and language integration with all students, especially multilingual learners. First, we describe shifts in conceptions of content and language. These conceptual shifts build on an asset-oriented view of multilingual learners to leverage the mutually supportive nature of content and language learning. Then, we describe our curriculum-based PD program with fifth-grade teachers of multilingual learners. Our PD program is guided by three design principles: (a) students bring assets, teachers bring assets; (b) students figure out, teachers figure out; and (c) students develop understanding over time, teachers develop understanding over time.

Conceptions of Content and Language with Multilingual Learners

A deficit-oriented view of language learners has long dominated language education and content area education (Lee, 2021; Lee & Stephens, 2020). Traditional conceptions focused on what language learners were lacking, as exemplified by the term “limited English proficient” students in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Based on this deficit view, traditional conceptions focused on how the education system could fix this problem, for example, by pre-teaching and frontloading vocabulary or providing sentence frames, both of which position English language proficiency as a precursor or prerequisite to participate in content learning (Grapin et al., 2021). With a shift to an asset-oriented view, as exemplified by the term “multilingual learners” in the latest English language proficiency standards (WIDA Consortium, 2020), contemporary conceptions focus on the meaning-making resources that students do bring for engaging in disciplinary practices and communicating their ideas regardless of their English proficiency.

Shifts in conceptions of content and language with multilingual learners have occurred in parallel. In content area education, traditional conceptions focused on individual learners’ mastery of discrete elements of content, whereas contemporary conceptions emphasize that students engage in disciplinary practices of content areas. Because contemporary conceptions involve using and applying knowledge for a purpose, they have been referred to as knowledge-in-use (Harris et al., 2019). In language education, traditional conceptions focused on discrete elements of vocabulary (lexicon) and grammar (syntax) to be internalized by individual learners, whereas contemporary conceptions emphasize that language is a dynamic set of meaning-making practices learned through participation in social contexts (García & Li, 2014; Grapin, 2019; Valdés et al., 2014). Because contemporary conceptions involve using language and other meaning-making resources (e.g., gestures, visuals) for a purpose, they have been referred to as language-in-use (Lee et al., 2013). Across content area education and language education, conceptual shifts are mutually supportive in promoting rigorous content learning and rich language use (see Table 1 below; for details, see Buxton & Lee, in press). In science education with multilingual learners, we refer to this as “doing science, using language” (Lee et al., 2019).

Table 1
Shifts From Traditional to Contemporary Conceptions of Science and Language with Multilingual Learners

Professional Development Programs Integrating Science and Language with Multilingual Learners

Since the release of the NGSS in 2013, we have been working toward building consensus among research (Lee et al., 2013), policy through science standards (e.g., NGSS) and English language proficiency standards (e.g., WIDA Consortium, 2020), and practice. In our previous project, in collaboration with elementary school teachers, we developed a fifth-grade NGSS-based curriculum called the Science And Integrated Language (SAIL) curriculum (Haas et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2019), which is available as an open educational resource. Currently, we are developing a curriculum-based PD program (Haas et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2023). Our PD program is grounded in three sources: (a) conceptual shifts for content and language described above, (b) findings from our previous curriculum development project (Haas et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2019), and (c) literature reviews on professional learning and PD programs in science education and language education (Lee et al., 2023). Given that the literature is in its infancy, we draw heavily from our previous curriculum development project.

Our PD program is grounded in the notion of symmetry in professional learning, which is defined as “giving adults opportunities to learn in ways that parallel how students learn” (Mehta & Fine, 2019, p. 484). As shifts from traditional to contemporary conceptions to meet the vision of the Framework and the NGSS present both opportunities and demands not only for students but also for teachers, professional learning experiences should be symmetrical to student learning experiences such that teachers experience learning like the students they will teach and learn to adapt their instruction for their students. With our focus on science and language integration with multilingual learners, we emphasize three design principles.

Design Principle 1: Guide teachers to develop an asset-oriented view of multilingual learners and instructional practices for recognizing and leveraging students’ assets.
This design principle addresses the importance of developing teachers’ orientation toward multilingual learners (prominent in our previous curriculum development project and the literature on learning to teach multilingual learners in content areas) as well as associated instructional practices for putting this orientation into action. To engage multilingual learners in science, teachers need to develop both the orientation that multilingual learners bring assets (e.g., meaning-making resources, knowledge, experiences) to the science classroom and the ability to leverage those assets in instruction.

Teachers bring rich knowledge and experiences, both personal and professional, to PD, just as their students bring rich knowledge and experiences to the science classroom. In PD, we adopt an asset-oriented approach that positions teachers as valued collaborators and contributors. At one level of symmetry, we cultivate the assets teachers bring by engaging them in the curriculum as students do. At another level, we cultivate the assets that teachers bring to help them make sense of our conceptual approach to asset-oriented instruction with multilingual learners.

Design Principle 2: Guide teachers to integrate science and language in mutually supportive ways with multilingual learners.
Building on and extending teachers’ asset orientation and associated instructional practices (Design Principle 1), this design principle addresses the importance of integrating science and language in mutually supportive ways (a challenge for teachers in our previous curriculum development project and in the literature broadly). Specifically, teachers need to make in-the-moment instructional decisions that capitalize on the mutually supportive nature of science and language learning with all students, especially multilingual learners. This design principle lays the foundation for teachers to develop more sophisticated instructional practices as they enact the curriculum in their classrooms and reflect on this enactment.

Teachers “figure out” in PD in parallel with how their students “figure out” in the science classroom. In PD, we engage teachers in three-dimensional learning while also supporting them to figure out new ways of teaching the NGSS with multilingual learners. At one level of symmetry, teachers figure out phenomena by engaging in three-dimensional learning as students do. At another level, by reflecting on their own process of figuring out phenomena, teachers figure out our conceptual approach to promoting science and language learning with multilingual learners.

Design Principle 3: Guide teachers to develop more sophisticated instructional practices for integrating science and language with multilingual learners over time.
Building on teachers’ growing repertoire of instructional practices for integrating science and language with multilingual learners (Design Principle 2), this design principle addresses the importance of teachers continuing to develop their instructional practices over time (a key finding from the literature as well as our curriculum development project that involved both new and returning teachers). Teacher learning progressions occur over a school year as teachers learn to implement different units of a curriculum as well as over multiple years as they teach the same curriculum to new classes of students.

Teachers, like their students, develop understanding over time. We structure PD so that teachers develop both science understanding and instructional practices to promote their students’ science understanding and language use over lessons and units. At one level of symmetry, over the course of the school year or multiple years, teachers develop more coherent understanding by engaging in the curriculum as students do. At another level, over the course of the school year or multiple years, teachers develop understanding of our conceptual approach to PD with teachers of multilingual learners.

Closing

The NGSS call for shifts in teachers’ instructional practices, especially in linguistically diverse science classrooms. PD that is symmetrical to student learning is one way to prepare teachers for this vision of science instruction. All learning, whether with children or adults, involves cultivating assets, figuring things out, and developing understanding over time. As teachers engage in symmetrical professional learning experiences, they will not only be prepared to teach, but they will also enjoy the professional learning process, rekindling a love for science and developing a deeper understanding of students’ diverse experiences, including those of multilingual learners.

Additional Resources

The SAIL curriculum is available as an open educational resource.  Additional teacher resources are available as open access webinars and topic briefs.

Acknowledgement

Blog author Okhee Lee is a 2023 ARISE blog series editor.  Read one of her blog choices by a team from Georgia Tech’s CEISMC, Co-Constructing “Good Trouble:” Understanding and Supporting Teacher Practices for Rightful Presence in STEAM Classrooms and watch for an upcoming blog by Dr. Natalie King, Georgia State University.

References

Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (in press). Section on diversity and equity in science education. In N. G. Lederman, D. Zeidler, & J. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (3rd ed.). Routledge.

García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. In O. Garcia, W. Lin, & S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education (3rd ed.). Springer International.

Grapin, S. E. (2019). Multimodality in the new content standards era: Implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 30-55. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesq.443

Grapin, S. E., Llosa, L., Haas, A., & Lee, O. (2021). Rethinking instructional strategies with English learners in the content areas. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 1-12.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesj.557

Haas, A., Januszyk, R., Grapin, S. E., Goggins, M., Llosa, L., & Lee, O. (2021). Developing instructional materials aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards for all students, including English learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(7), 735-756. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1827190

Haas, A., Schwenger, A., Master, L., Grapin, S. E., & Lee, O. (2023). Symmetry in NGSS teacher professional learning: “Walking the walk” and “talking the talk.” Science and Children, 60(5), 60-63. https://www.nsta.org/science-and-children/science-and-children-mayjune-2023/walking-walk-and-talking-talk

Harris, C., Krajcik, J., Pellegrino, J., & DeBarger, A. (2019). Designing knowledge-in-use assessments to promote deeper learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(2), 53-67.    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12253

Lee, O. (2021). Asset-oriented framing of science and language with multilingual learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 1073-1979.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21694

Lee, O., Grapin, S. E., & Haas, A. (2023). Teacher professional development programs integrating science and language with multilingual learners: A conceptual framework. Science Education, 107(5), 1302-1323. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21807

Lee, O., Llosa, L., Grapin, S. E., Haas, A., & Goggins, M. (2019). Science and language integration with English learners: A conceptual framework guiding instructional materials development. Science Education, 103(2), 317-337. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21498

Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223-233. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X13480524

Lee, O., & Stephens, A. (2020). English learners in STEM subjects: Contemporary views on STEM subjects and language with English learners. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 426-432. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X20923708

Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2019). In search of deeper learning: The quest to remake the American high school. Harvard University Press.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). English learners in STEM subjects: Transforming classrooms, schools, and lives. National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25182/english-learners-in-stem-subjects-transforming-classrooms-schools-and-lives

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013a). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013b). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Appendix D–All standards, all students: Making the NGSS accessible to all students. https://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/ngss-appendices

Valdés, G., Kibler, A., & Walqui, A. (2014). Changes in the expertise of ESL professionals: Knowledge and action in an era of new standards. TESOL International Association. https://www.tesol.org/media/y5mj4cdr/changes-in-standards-professional-paper-26-march-2014.pdf

WIDA Consortium. (2020). WIDA English language development standards framework, 2020 edition. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.    https://wida.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/resource/WIDA-ELD-Standards-Framework-2020.pdf

Okhee Lee, Ph.D., Professor, New York University
olee@nyu.edu

Okhee Lee is a professor in the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development at New York University. She is committed to advancing research, policy, and practice that promote STEM and language learning for all students, particularly multilingual learners. Her work involves integrating science, language, and computational thinking with a focus on multilingual learners. Her latest work addresses justice-centered STEM education with multilingual learners by integrating multiple STEM subjects, including data science and computer science, to address pressing societal challenges using the case of the COVID-19 pandemic.

,

Scott E. Grapin, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, University of Miami
sgrapin@miami.edu

Scott E. Grapin is an assistant professor in the School of Education and Human Development at the University of Miami (FL). His research centers on equity and justice for multilingual learners in K-12 education, particularly in STEM subjects. He has facilitated professional learning with in-service teachers at local, state, and national levels and currently teaches pre-service teachers preparing to work with multilingual learners across content areas. He began his career in education as an English as a second language (ESL) teacher in the New Jersey public schools.

,

Alison Haas, Ph.D., Director of Development and Implementation, SAIL Research Lab, New York University
ams728@nyu.edu

Alison Haas is the Director of Development and Implementation for the Science And Integrated Language (SAIL) Research Lab at New York University. Her work focuses on integrating science, language, and computational thinking and modeling for all students, including multilingual learners. She leads curriculum development and professional learning for elementary teachers across the nation.

Filed Under: Blog

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive the:
  • newsletter,
  • blog,
  • webinars, and
  • announcements
to keep current on the latest ARISE happenings

SUBSCRIBE

Featured Post

December 4, 2025
Professional Learning Communities in STEM Teacher Preparation
Caption: Fall 2024 Kean NSF Noyce CREST Scholar Cohort #1 – Jairo M. Victoriano (Mathematics Education); Deirdre Corbett and Aliyah Wilson (Mathematics Education/Teacher of Students w/Disabilities); Hailey Kassteen (Biology Education); Matthew Velasquez (Biology Education/Teacher of Students w/Disabilities) Higher education, in many academic... Read More

Past Posts

September 10, 2025
Five Points STEM Educators Should Consider When Integrating GenAI Within Their Methods Courses
STEM teacher educators are responsible for preparing prospective and in-service teachers with the knowledge and skills to optimize positive learning outcomes within their own classrooms. Thus, faculty often have to ensure the content of the professional learning activities they facilitate is timely... Read More
August 21, 2025
Content Consultations: How STEM Teachers Can Consult with Special Educators to Meet the Needs of All Students
STEM teachers, whether in rural, urban, suburban, or First Nations settings, are acutely aware of the mandate to provide equitable access for students with learning differences (e.g., learning disabilities, exceptionalities, or special education needs). Yet, data indicate that STEM teachers have not... Read More

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE- 2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

ARISE is Brought to You by NSF and AAAS - The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About AAAS ARISE
  • AAAS ISEED
  •  
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  •  
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2026 American Association for the Advancement of Science