ARISE

Advancing Research & Innovation in STEM Education of Preservice Teachers in High-Needs School Districts

NSF
  • Home
  • About
    • About ARISE
    • ARISE Evaluation
    • ARISE Advisory Board
    • ARISE Team
    • About AAAS
    • About NSF
  • Blog
    • 2026 Call for ARISE Blog Submissions
  • What’s New?
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Commissioned Papers
    • ARISE Webinars
    • NSF Proposal Preparation Webinars
    • Bibliography
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Promising Practices
    • ARISE Convenings
      • Upcoming Meetings & Presentations
      • Past Meetings & Presentations
        • Noyce Regional Dialogues
    • Helpful Links
  • Opportunities
    • Submit an Evidence-Based Innovation
      • ARISE Evidence-Based Innovation Guidelines
    • Submit a Research Article/Report
    • Submit a Proposal for a Virtual Workshop
    • Grants
    • Dissemination
    • Professional Development Opportunities
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
ARISE / Annotated Bibliography / Coordinated and Intersecting: How Preservice Secondary Science Teachers Understand Science and Engineering Practices and Instructional Principles for Diverse Students

Coordinated and Intersecting: How Preservice Secondary Science Teachers Understand Science and Engineering Practices and Instructional Principles for Diverse Students

Summary

Teacher education programs need to prepare their preservice teachers to both implement current
science education reforms and teach in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. In this
qualitative study, we used a framework of four instructional principles to investigate 31 preservice
secondary science teachers’ understanding of instruction aligned with current reforms and
responsive to culturally and linguistically diverse students. We analyzed interview data to examine
preservice teachers’ evolving understanding of the principle of engaging students in disciplinary
practices, specifically the eight science and engineering practices (SEPs) highlighted in current U.S.
standards. We found that, over time, participants more often discussed using multiple SEPs together
in coordinated ways. However, they consistently reported struggling with the SEPs of developing and
using models and using mathematics and computational thinking. Further, we examined how participants discussed engaging students in disciplinary practices in intersection with the three other principles in our framework: providing students with language production opportunities, attending to and supporting disciplinary language demands, and using student funds of knowledge and other
resources. We found that participants focused more often on language production and language
support than on student funds of knowledge in intersection with SEPs. Further, participants most
frequently discussed the SEP of engaging in argument from evidence in intersection with the other three
principles. This study is useful for informing teacher educators on how to better support preservice
secondary science teachers in developing their understanding of engaging students in disciplinary
practices and other instructional principles for diverse students.

Year

2023

Noyce Award Number

DUE-1557283

Grade Level

Graduate-level (initial teacher preparation), Post-bac-level (initial teacher preparation)

Discipline

Science

Resource Type

Article - Peer-reviewed Journal

URL

https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/22631

Citation

Carpenter, S. L., Macias, M., Arevalo, E., Hansen, A. K., Stone, E. M., & Bianchini, J. A. (2023). Coordinated and intersecting: How preservice secondary science teachers understand science and engineering practices and instructional principles for diverse students. Electronic Journal for Research in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(2), 25-56.

Content Focus

Teacher candidate learning—content, Teacher candidate learning—pedagogy

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE- 2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

ARISE is Brought to You by NSF and AAAS - The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About AAAS ARISE
  • AAAS ISEED
  •  
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  •  
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2026 American Association for the Advancement of Science