ARISE

Advancing Research & Innovation in STEM Education of Preservice Teachers in High-Needs School Districts

NSF
  • Home
  • About
    • About ARISE
    • ARISE Evaluation
    • ARISE Advisory Board
    • ARISE Team
    • About AAAS
    • About NSF
  • Blog
    • ARISE Blog Submission Criteria
  • What’s New?
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Commissioned Papers
    • ARISE Webinars
    • NSF Proposal Preparation Webinars
    • Bibliography
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Promising Practices
    • ARISE Convenings
      • Upcoming Meetings & Presentations
      • Past Meetings & Presentations
        • Noyce Regional Dialogues
    • Helpful Links
  • Opportunities
    • Submit an Evidence-Based Innovation
      • ARISE Evidence-Based Innovation Guidelines
    • Submit a Research Article/Report
    • Submit Ideas for Our Blog/Webinar/Newsletter
    • Grants
    • Dissemination
    • Professional Development Opportunities
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
ARISE / Seizing Opportunities in 2021: Building on What We Know

Seizing Opportunities in 2021: Building on What We Know

January 6, 2021 by Betty Calinger

By: Shirley Malcom, Ph.D., Senior Advisor, AAAS Sea Change; Emeritas Director, Education & Human Resources Programs, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Almost 25 years ago, AAAS convened a National Science Foundation supported conference to consider how best to train science and mathematics teachers. Interestingly, the attendees were one hundred and two deans, the dean of education and the dean of science from fifty-one institutions. The report of that conference, “Seizing Opportunities: Collaborating for Excellence in Teacher Preparation” (Bell & Bucchino, 1997), can be found here.

This conference was held at a time when there was great activity and energy around science and mathematics education reform. The conversations of 1996 would likely sound quite familiar since we were all wrestling with many of the same issues we discuss today: what is a good teacher, and what education and experiences need to be provided to prepare such a person? Several deans told me that that was the first occasion they had had to sit with their dean colleague from the same institution to consider a consolidated plan, this, despite the fact that, technically, they shared the responsibility for providing excellent programs for students preparing to become science and mathematics teachers.

The 1980s and 1990s were times of great debates about K-12 mathematics and science education, much of the conversation around what content should be taught and what every child should learn. It was at the Education Summit in Charlottesville in 1989, convened by President George H.W. Bush with the nation’s governors that there was a call for content standards along with articulation as one of the National Education Goals: that by the year 2000, “United States students will be the first in the world in mathematics and science achievement.” This action was stimulated by lackluster performance of U.S. students on international tests of science and mathematics compared with students from the rest of the world.

Around the same time a higher education-focused study began relatively quietly in 1990 that sought to understand why students of above average ability were leaving science, mathematics and engineering programs as undergraduates. In the report of the research, Talking About Leaving:  Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences (1997), Elaine Seymour and Nancy Hewitt found a relationship between poor teaching and weed out courses and field switching, disproportionately seen for women and students of color. In so many ways this study stimulated the undergraduate teaching reform movement. But the links between the K-12 and higher education discussions had not yet converged.

Despite the separateness of the K-12 and higher education conversations the recommendations of the “Seizing Opportunities” conference included elements that began to link the two, such as the call for college faculty to “model” the kind of instruction that science and mathematics teachers should use so that they would teach as they are taught rather than as they were taught to teach.

Fast Forward to Today

AAAS SEA Change is an initiative to support institutional transformation so that diversity, equity and inclusion in STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine) are normative. The SEA Change Institute recently offered a series of web events to make visible the research from the book, Talking About Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Re-location and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education (TALR) (Seymour & Hunter, 2019).


Learn how we can support your institutional transformation towards diversity, equity, and inclusion.
This research was a follow up of Talking About Leaving mentioned above and published over 20 years ago. In TALR, the researchers, among other findings, talk about the impact of K-12 under-preparation in the loss of students from introductory STEM courses, leading to field switching from STEM, with this under-preparation playing an especially prominent role in losses of students of color. Under-preparation at the K-12 level of Black, Latinx, Indigenous and other students of color as well as first generation and rural students may follow from lack of rigorous curricular offerings and well-prepared teachers often fueled by societal expectations about who can (or who should) do science.

Having spent a career working on efforts to diversify STEMM fields, I have thought a lot about how to get at the root of this issue. Some while ago I thought that the solutions might lie in K-12 teacher professional development. And then I connected the dots between these separate conversations of the K-12 and higher education communities. I was further disabused of the idea that it was a “K-12 problem” when a friend noted how many times teachers left teacher education programs, “in immediate need of a 50,000 mile tune up.” This friend had done the major surveys of science and mathematics teachers, so she had a deep understanding of the problems viewed through a national lens.

So that means we end where we began, turning again to what is happening in our colleges and universities. Let’s imagine that we could reconvene that group of deans. What would today’s conversation be? How to help future teachers better understand their learners, introduce culturally relevant content? How to help science and mathematics faculty model the teaching we hope future teachers will use? How do we build on what we know; and how do we seize this opportunity?

Facing Today’s Challenges

I can only hope that we start the conversations where the deans left off almost 25 years ago, but how do we move from conversation to strategic, collaborative action and not be stuck in the same place 25 years from now?

What is a good teacher? For quite a while a discussion of the challenges of the system of STEM teacher education tended to focus on content knowledge (or lack thereof), especially at the high school level, and increasingly for middle grades as well. How do we find the balance across concerns of what we teach, how we teach, who we teach and to what ends we teach?

I suggest that these conversations need to take place both within the K-12 and university communities, separately and then together.  How aligned are the visions?  If the visions are already closely aligned, what is the reality?  If they are misaligned, what is needed from both communities to support a convergence?  Are these conversations being informed by research?
What education and experiences need to be provided? Obviously, we can support the idea of engagement with schools and excellent teachers; for opportunities to connect with people who are deeply embedded in the community and supportive of their students, willing to take them from where they are to however far they can go. And within higher education, certainly, for reasons of student retention and understanding, college level courses must be designed to support learners, with faculty modeling active and engaged teaching.  Also, what can be learned from engaging those who would become teachers in the informal science environment of science and technology centers and community programs?

Implications: Recommendations for New Year’s Resolutions

Those who would become faculty must be provided the knowledge and skills to teach well.  Teaching faculty how to teach and evaluating their ability to effectively do so seems obvious yet is rarely done, so what needs to happen? Consider providing teaching opportunities and learning via Teaching and Learning Centers for those who would be the next generation of faculty. Take advantage of the current disruption to offer assistance to faculty who are trying their best to provide quality instruction in a virtual environment—especially thinking more deeply about engagement.  Incentivize quality teaching through recognition and through promotion and tenure.  Hire those who can/do teach as well as can/do quality research.  A culture of experimentation and mutual support needs also to be modeled, with movement away from the individual grade as a goal.

The rareness of STEM and education faculty intentionally collaborating should be addressed. While connection between education and content is required in the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, for example, how authentic are those connections on the ground?  Consider models like Terrapin Teachers, a collaborative initiative of the University of Maryland Provost’s Office, the College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences (CMNS), and the College of Education, designed to  get science majors into K-12 classrooms as soon/early as possible.  An ARISE blog by Noyce PI Neal Grandgenett et al. (2019) describes efforts at the University of Nebraska Omaha to “break down departmental silos” to develop programs that collectively support high quality P-12 teachers and can make a difference for all students (pre- and in-service teachers and traditional STEM and non-STEM majors.

Conversations within STEM departments about how to design courses and teach for student success should be the norm.  Or are faculty still stuck with the idea of a “fixed mindset” about who can learn science and mathematics?  The pandemic has challenged higher education as well as K-12, requiring new skills and new thinking.  It has also opened opportunities for research to figure out the impact of the pandemic disruption on student learning.  And it falls to us to re-think all these things we thought we knew about teaching and learning science and mathematics.

This is a big, audacious vision, just as it was in 1996. And just as in 1996, we realize the need for commitment that spans institutional units–teaching the children well means we must teach the teachers well.

References

Bell, J.A., & Bucchino, A. (1997). Seizing opportunities:  Collaborating for excellence in teacher education. AAAS: Washington, DC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED434806.pdf.

Grandgenett, N., Cutucache, C., Tapprich, W., & Dorn, B. (2019, March 3). Bulldozing the STEM silos in Omaha while engaging P-12 teachers and building campus STEM excellence. ARISE. https://aaas-arise.org/2019/03/25/bulldozing-the-stem-silos/

Seymour, E., & Hunter, A-B. (2019). Talking about leaving:  Persistence, Re-location and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. Springer: Switzerland.

Seymour, E. & Hewitt, J. (1997).  Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press: Boulder.

 

 

Shirley M. Malcom, Ph.D., Senior Advisor, AAAS Sea Change; Emeritas Director, Education & Human Resources Programs, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
smalcom@aaas.org

Shirley Malcom has led numerous programs in education, activities for underrepresented groups, and public understanding of science and technology. Dr. Malcom was head of the AAAS Office of Opportunities in Science from 1979 to 1989. Between 1977 and 1979, she served as program officer in the Science Education Directorate of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Prior to this, she held the rank of assistant professor of biology, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, and for two years was a high school science teacher. Dr. Malcom received her doctorate in ecology from The Pennsylvania State University; master’s degree in zoology from the University of California, Los Angeles; and bachelor’s degree with distinction in zoology from the University of Washington. In addition, she holds 17 honorary degrees and is a Regent of Morgan State University and trustee of Caltech.

 

Filed Under: Blog

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive the:
  • newsletter,
  • blog,
  • webinars, and
  • announcements
to keep current on the latest ARISE happenings

SUBSCRIBE

Featured Post

Picture of sky with bursts of light
January 18, 2023
Teaching the Teacher: Social Justice, Equity, and the Future of Science
As we reflect on the past three years that embroiled Americans in a pandemic, which highlighted educational inequities and social justice issues, two looming questions arise. How will we utilize the lessons learned and our new awareness of individual and communal perseverance and resilience? Will we employ these lessons and new awareness to frame and... Read More

Past Posts

December 13, 2022
Let’s Stop Saying that Math is the Universal Language
Every math and science teacher of a certain age has seen it, probably multiple times. Many of us have shown it in our classes. It’s the scene from the movie Contact (Zemeckis, 1997) where the character played by Jodie Foster first hears from the aliens. It’s exciting, dramatic—the pulsing noise from space pushing through the... Read More
November 9, 2022
Productive Struggle: An Opportunity for In-Depth Mathematics Learning
Struggle is a regular part of mathematics class: students struggle to get started, to carry out a process, to express misconceptions and errors, and with “uncertainty in explaining and sense-making” (Warshauer, 2015, p. 385). We have been investigating the struggles of prospective mathematics teachers (PTs) in a middle school methods course (Kamlue & Van Zoest,... Read More

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE- 2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

ARISE is Brought to You by NSF and AAAS - The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About AAAS ARISE
  • AAAS ISEED
  •  
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  •  
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science