ARISE

Advancing Research & Innovation in STEM Education of Preservice Teachers in High-Needs School Districts

NSF
  • Home
  • About
    • About ARISE
    • ARISE Evaluation
    • ARISE Advisory Board
    • ARISE Team
    • About AAAS
    • About NSF
  • Blog
    • ARISE Blog Submission Criteria
  • What’s New?
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Commissioned Papers
    • ARISE Webinars
    • NSF Proposal Preparation Webinars
    • Bibliography
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Promising Practices
    • ARISE Convenings
      • Upcoming Meetings & Presentations
      • Past Meetings & Presentations
        • Noyce Regional Dialogues
    • Helpful Links
  • Opportunities
    • Submit an Evidence-Based Innovation
      • ARISE Evidence-Based Innovation Guidelines
    • Submit a Research Article/Report
    • Submit Ideas for Our Blog/Webinar/Newsletter
    • Grants
    • Dissemination
    • Professional Development Opportunities
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
ARISE / Reimagining the STEM Education Pipeline for Teachers of Color

Reimagining the STEM Education Pipeline for Teachers of Color

February 16, 2021 by Betty Calinger

By: Ruthmae Sears, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of South Florida
Naomi Jessup, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Georgia State University
Lou Matthews, Ph.D., Director of Mathematics and Science, Urban Teachers

A picture of an African American teacher working with middle school students.
A teacher helps students during a coding lesson at Sutton Middle School.
Photo by Allison Shelley for American Education: Images of Teachers and Students in Action

Increasing the presence and representation of people of Color is essential to giving more children and communities access to diverse, highly qualified, STEM educators. As Black authors, and scholars of Color, each of our careers is a reflection of that reality, with our combined 50 years as STEM educators. Throughout the United States, and in the Caribbean, we have taken on roles as mentors, guides, advisors, and leaders of STEM programs to specifically caretake how people of Color experience and navigate them. These roles have been both paid and voluntary roles, grounded in our membership in communities of Color and our commitment to diversity and equity in STEM. From this perspective, we draw upon both our expertise as well as the extant literature to collectively give voice to powerful ways that the teacher pipeline must be disrupted. We wish to not only advocate for change in the pipeline but also to impact how teachers of Color advocate for themselves.

Shifting Diversity, A Broken Pipeline

As the United States grows increasingly diverse, there are challenges around stagnant changes in diversity in the educator pipeline. The problem is complexly simple – education is overwhelmingly a place where communities of Color are inadequately represented. The U.S. Department of Education report on The State of Racial Diversity in the Educator Workforce (2016) indicates that 82% of the elementary and secondary educator workforce is white; which further implies that teacher preparation programs at institutions of higher education prepare predominantly white teacher candidates. Moreover, even though school populations are becoming reflective of the global majority, there exist widespread disparities in the proportion of students of Color (i.e., Black, Latinx [Hispanic], Indigenous, or mixed races) in relation to teachers of Color. For instance, although 16% of the student population was Black, only 7% of the public school teachers were Black. Similarly, although 24% of the student population identified as Hispanic, only 8% of the public school teachers were Hispanic.

This disproportion matters to us because at the heart of this troubling reality is a broken teacher pipeline – the pathway of access, opportunities, and outcomes that define how children of Color come to be STEM educators of Color. The lack of quality of current efforts to create sustainable STEM pipelines for Black educators has been noted. According to the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service (2016), the quality of racial diversity decreases at every point in current teacher education pipelines from entry to exit. In this article, we raise our voices to call out this broken pathway by discussing key ways in which the pipeline might be adjusted at critical points to support the recruitment and retention of STEM educators of Color.

Recommendations for Rethinking the STEM Teacher Pipeline

Create early identity-building experiences for students of color. The representation challenge in STEM education is pronounced and for us one of the most pressing long-term actions in demystifying STEM professional identities lays in the focus on early experiences.
 The process of recruiting STEM teachers of Color is too compartmentalized within the confines of higher education and nonprofit education agencies. With early experiences, we envision recruiting teachers of Color within communities and K-12 settings using strategies that continue to community colleges and universities. The ‘hidden figures’ movement (aptly named after the popular movie 2016 Hidden Figures featuring the contributions of African American women in the mission to land a man on the moon in the 1960s) illuminates the need to unearth powerful stories and images for children of Color , and all children, in STEM. In 2018, the comic-adapted movie, Black Panther, offered another imagery-filled portrayal of Black characters with leading STEM-directed roles. Yet, more specific to STEM education are the roles of educators and how young children come to pursue roles as STEM educators.

Exposing students to the benefits of becoming a teacher during their K-12 preparation can increase the likelihood that they will choose to pursue a tertiary degree in education (Perkins, 2016). Currently, we see this work as more generalized, but there is a need for a very specific focus on STEM teaching in recruitment efforts for people of Color. K-12 schools could create introductory STEM teaching experiences for students of Color in the form of teacher aides, assistants, tutors, club participation and leadership, and community outreach which features STEM education work with others. These opportunities within the K-12 setting have the potential of catalyzing robust STEM educator identities amongst children of Color and can empower students to be change agents within their communities. School districts may also engage in a Grow-Your-Own model, in which they provide mentorship and financial support to individuals who are committed to returning to the district as teachers (Gist, Bianco, & Lyn, 2019). While institutions of higher education may benefit from bridge programs that orient students to college life, why not equip them with essential skills, and provide appropriate advising to navigate their tertiary programs to obtain teaching certifications (Grace-Odeleye, & Santiago, 2019).

Tackle dehumanizing practices and conditions in STEM education. Increasing efforts to retain teachers of Color in STEM requires a critical analysis of how diversity is valued and operationalized.
From our professional experiences, we can speak to individual stories of how the representation of race in STEM education did not equate to valuing differences and diverse perspectives. Often STEM teachers of Color feel marginalized through their experiences and face higher levels of scrutiny to complete STEM programs. As we continue further down the STEM pipeline, there are occurrences when faculty of Color feel marginalized because of discounted perceptions of their spoken language and may perceive the need to engage in code-switching to communicate their thinking. Unfortunately, when people feel marginalized, their identity and agency are impacted. These experiences damage individuals’ identities and create survival practices perceived as “acting white” (Stinson, 2013), or the pressure of fulfilling roles of “tokenism” to be a minority within a white space (Martin & Larnell, 2013). Differences of perspectives, culture, language, gender, and abilities ought to be valued, and not viewed as a deficit or problematic. A conscious effort is needed to embrace the characteristics and traits each individual possesses. Thus, the educational community needs to critically examine the dehumanizing practices and conditions that continue to marginalize STEM teachers upon acceptance into their respected programs. This type of critical examination requires systemic reflection, assessment, and action.

Moreover, systemic efforts are needed to address disparities in STEM education by attending to the continual growth in teachers of Color identity and power dynamics within these educational spaces. Gutierrez (2012) suggested that identity and power are dimensions of equity that critically highlight and build upon the cultural identities of marginalized groups while attending to social and political aspects that are in play. Institutions of higher education should reflect on means to support teachers of Color STEM identities, and empowerment within STEM disciplines.

Prioritize thriving through support mechanisms for STEM teachers of Color. Support mechanisms are needed to ensure STEM teachers not only survive in the profession but thrive!
Too often, institutions congratulate themselves for recruiting STEM teachers of Color but provide very limited support mechanisms afterward. Mechanisms can reduce the burden of having teachers of Color navigate educational spaces or advocate for themselves alone. Support mechanisms include (but are not limited to) mentorship, quality advisement, formative feedback, targeted programming, engagement in professional learning communities, funding to attend professional development training, and an ombudsman to advocate against unfair policies and practices (Carver-Thomas, 2018). These support mechanisms create safe spaces and promote communities to correct gaps in knowledge that may exist, provide opportunities to learn and share ideas about means to navigate the educational system and address challenges faced, and provide access to knowledgeable others. The mechanisms should promote asset-based perspectives and affirmation, rather than deficit ideologies. These mechanisms further illustrate a commitment for all members of the ecosystem to thrive. Like diverse flora and fauna in botanical gardens that have different needs to grow and blossom, the mechanisms offered should cater to the diverse needs of the population.

Closing

In closing, we acknowledge that several inequities disrupt the progress of teachers of Color along the STEM pipeline. School districts and institutions of higher education can play a vital part in disrupting these conditions through critical reflection and taking action. We provide three approaches as starting points to unclog the pipeline that include innovative approaches from K-12 settings that continue beyond experiences in higher education to induction years.

Time is precious and generations of students of Color are missing out on opportunities to be taught by someone like them.
Now is the time for intentional efforts to recruit and retain individuals of Color in the STEM education workforce and create mechanisms that support their thriving within the teaching profession.

References

Carver-Thomas, D. (2018). Diversifying the teaching profession: How to recruit and retain teachers of color. Learning Policy Institute.

Gist, C. D., Bianco, M., & Lynn, M. (2019). Examining grow your own programs across the teacher development continuum: Mining research on teachers of color and nontraditional educator pipelines. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 13-25.

Gist, C. D. (2017). Voices of aspiring teachers of color: Unraveling the double bind in teacher education. Urban Education, 52(8), 927-956.

Grace-Odeleye, B., & Santiago, J. (2019). A review of some diverse models of summer bridge programs for first-generation and at-risk college students. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 9(1), 35-47.

Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education (pp. 17-33). Dordrecht: Springer.

Martin, D. B., & Larnell, G. V. (2013). Urban mathematics education. In H.R. Milner & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 373-393). New York City: Routledge.

Perkins, B. (2016). Growing the next generation: A program encourages students of color to become teachers. American Educator, 40(3), 12-16.

Stinson, D. W. (2013). Negotiating the “White male math myth”: African American male students and success in school mathematics.  Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 69-99.

U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service (2016). The state of racial diversity in the educator workforce. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/racial-diversity/state-racial-diversity-workforce.pdf.

Ruthmae Sears, Associate Professor, University of South Florida
ruthmaesears@usf.edu

Dr. Ruthmae Sears is an Associate Professor at the University of South Florida. Her research focuses on curriculum issues, the development of reasoning and proof skills, clinical experiences in secondary mathematics, and the integration of technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Dr. Sears was the 2016 Florida Association of Mathematics Teacher Educator (FAMTE) Mathematics Teacher Educator of the Year. Additionally, she was selected as an NSF funded IAspire Leadership Academy Fellow.

,

Naomi Jessup, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Georgia State University
njessup@gsu.edu

Dr. Naomi Jessup is an assistant professor of mathematics education at Georgia State University. She has more than 15 years of experience in the field of mathematics education at the kindergarten-12 and college/university level serving as an elementary school teacher, K-8 mathematics instructional coach (school and district level) and methods course instructor. Her current mathematics education research focuses on understanding teacher learning and development–specifically teacher noticing, framing, and children’s mathematical thinking.

,

Lou Matthews, Ph.D., Director of Mathematics and Science, Urban Teachers
lou.matthews@urbanteachers.org

Dr. Lou Matthews is currently the Director of Mathematics and Science at Urban Teachers and founder/CEO of Inspiremath Ltd. He led efforts to create the Journal of Urban Mathematics Education in 2008 and served as its founding Editor-in-Chief. Dr. Matthews has also served as a former regional representative and president of the Benjamin Banneker Association and is a former Director of Schools and Acting Commissioner of Bermuda Public Schools.

Filed Under: Blog

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive the:
  • newsletter,
  • blog,
  • webinars, and
  • announcements
to keep current on the latest ARISE happenings

SUBSCRIBE

Featured Post

March 21, 2023
Technology in Teacher Education: Science, Society, and Students
The field of teacher education has experienced incredible challenges, upheaval, and opportunities over the past few years. The twin catalysts of a worldwide pandemic and social activism related to pervasive issues of inequity have caused many in the education community to rethink the state of the profession and the ways that teachers are prepared to... Read More

Past Posts

Pictures of doctors
February 15, 2023
What Image Comes to Your Mind When You Think of a “Doctor”?
Implicit bias is something we have all experienced or even inadvertently perpetuated. In teaching, the implicit bias, automatic thoughts, views, or judgments we may have about students can deprive them of opportunities and learning experiences. Implicit bias develops over a lifetime and is described as attitudes or stereotypes that affect our judgements or assessments of others... Read More
Picture of sky with bursts of light
January 18, 2023
Teaching the Teacher: Social Justice, Equity, and the Future of Science
As we reflect on the past three years that embroiled Americans in a pandemic, which highlighted educational inequities and social justice issues, two looming questions arise. How will we utilize the lessons learned and our new awareness of individual and communal perseverance and resilience? Will we employ these lessons and new awareness to frame and... Read More

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE- 2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

ARISE is Brought to You by NSF and AAAS - The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About AAAS ARISE
  • AAAS ISEED
  •  
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  •  
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science