ARISE

Advancing Research & Innovation in STEM Education of Preservice Teachers in High-Needs School Districts

NSF
  • Home
  • About
    • About ARISE
    • ARISE Evaluation
    • ARISE Advisory Board
    • ARISE Team
    • About AAAS
    • About NSF
  • Blog
    • ARISE Blog Submission Criteria
  • What’s New?
    • News
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Commissioned Papers
    • ARISE Webinars
    • NSF Proposal Preparation Webinars
    • Bibliography
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Promising Practices
    • ARISE Convenings
      • Upcoming Meetings & Presentations
      • Past Meetings & Presentations
        • Noyce Regional Dialogues
    • Helpful Links
  • Opportunities
    • Submit an Evidence-Based Innovation
      • ARISE Evidence-Based Innovation Guidelines
    • Submit a Research Article/Report
    • Submit Ideas for Our Blog/Webinar/Newsletter
    • Grants
    • Dissemination
    • Professional Development Opportunities
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
ARISE / Consider the Source(s): Supporting the Cultivation of Early Career STEM Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs

Consider the Source(s): Supporting the Cultivation of Early Career STEM Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs

March 28, 2022 by Betty Calinger

By: Jessica Gale, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, Georgia Institute of Technology
Meltem Alemdar, Ph.D., Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist, Georgia Institute of Technology

Noyce scholars and fellows at 2019 Summit. Photo by Colella Digital.

Teachers’ beliefs in what they can do are powerful. Decades of research illustrates interconnections between teaching self-efficacy, teacher effectiveness, (Wolters & Daugherty, 2007; Woolfolk et al., 1990) and student achievement (Anderson et al., 1988; Caprara et al., 2006). Teaching self-efficacy, defined as teachers’ beliefs in their ability to effectively handle the tasks, obligations, and challenges of teaching, is often measured using validated instruments, such as the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) (Woolfolk et al., 1990). As self-efficacy beliefs are context-specific, instruments often include items designed to measure self-efficacy for specific aspects of teaching (e.g., classroom management) or subject areas. These measures provide invaluable data for research and evaluation studies investigating the development of teachers’ self-efficacy. Indeed, within teacher education programs, including many NSF-funded Noyce projects, measuring teaching self-efficacy is common. In addition to understanding levels of self-efficacy (e.g., whether teachers have high or low self-efficacy), education researchers have taken a keen interest in the sources of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. What experiences, information, and interactions influence teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs? Bandura (1997) theorized four sources: Mastery Experiences, Vicarious Experiences, Social Persuasions, and Affective or Physiological States. The table below provides descriptions of each source.

Sources of Self-Efficacy Description
Mastery Experiences Thought to be the most powerful source of self-efficacy beliefs, Mastery Experiences involve the attainment of goals through direct action. For teachers, common mastery experiences include successfully teaching a lesson or observing positive outcomes (e.g., student performance or engagement).
Vicarious Experiences Vicarious Experiences occur when one observes a model (or oneself) doing a task. Vicarious experiences are thought to be most influential when the model is perceived to be similar to oneself. For teachers, one common vicarious experience is observing the teaching practice of a grade-level or subject-area colleague.
Social Persuasions Social Persuasions occur when one receives messages or feedback from others. For teachers, social persuasions can include both formal evaluations as well as informal feedback from colleagues, administrators, students, and community members.
Effective or Physiological States Affective or Physiological States including mood, stress, and anxiety. For teachers, common affective or physiological states may include positive emotions or feelings of excitement that occur when teaching is going well or negative states like stress and anxiety that arise from challenges in the classroom.
Understanding the sources of early career teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs is critical, as these beliefs tend to form early in the process of learning and, once formed, can be resistant to change (Bandura, 1997). As part of our National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Noyce Teacher Networks and Self-Efficacy Study (Grant #1660597), we wanted to develop deeper understandings of the experiences teachers draw upon when appraising their self-efficacy. The study includes a national sample of teachers (n=179) who participated in the NSF’s Robert Noyce Scholarship Program, which recruits, prepares, and supports STEM teachers in high-need schools. Because the origins of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs tend to be complex, we used qualitative research methods to explore teachers’ unique experiences related to the sources of self-efficacy. Noyce teachers from 47 programs in 30 states completed our survey that supplemented a validated self-efficacy instrument, the TSES (Woolfolk et al., 1990), with two open-ended questions adapted from Morris (2011):

  • What experiences in your professional life as a teacher have increased your confidence in your teaching?
  • What experiences in your professional life as a teacher have decreased your confidence in your teaching?

These questions do not target each of the sources of self-efficacy explicitly. Rather, by asking teachers to reflect broadly on both positive and negative teaching experiences, the questions invite teachers to share information on the most influential sources of their self-efficacy. Although many teachers provided rich responses aligned to one or more of the sources of self-efficacy, we still had many questions. Specifically, because the survey format doesn’t allow for follow-up questions, it was often difficult to develop a clear understanding of exactly how experiences reflecting the sources either increased or decreased self-efficacy. Thus, following the survey, we decided to conduct interviews with 10 Noyce teachers  to gather more nuanced, contextualized narratives that would further reveal the sources of Noyce teachers’ self-efficacy. Interview participants were purposively selected to include perspectives from teachers with a broad range of self-efficacy levels and, to the degree possible, genders and subject areas (math or science). Below we highlight findings that illustrate how this multi-phase approach to studying the sources of self-efficacy strengthened the study design, allowing us to make better sense of our results.

A Complex of Sources

Our analysis of survey and interview data revealed that, for many teachers, the sources of self-efficacy were interwoven. Some of the most powerful experiences teachers described involved both mastery experiences and social persuasions. For example, in one interview, a teacher highlighted how positive feedback from a math coach and math department colleagues (social persuasions) combined with positive outcomes in student learning and engagement (mastery experiences) to boost her confidence:

The math coach came in and observed me doing a mad minute, where the kids just practice a skill. She saw that I turned it into a way that it was engaging for the students, which was one of my goals for this year, to make math more engaging for the students. The entire math department was really impressed by the activity that I would do with them. I've been shouted out or highlighted for a lot of those activities. Not just for the engagement, but also, the students had taken their trimester exam, and we scored number one out of the entire network for algebra. So that really boosted my confidence.

For this teacher, being “shouted out” and receiving recognition for her practice validated her positive belief about her ability to achieve her goal of making math more engaging for students.

Although they were mentioned less frequently, teachers also discussed how vicarious experiences and affective or physiological states interacted with other sources to influence their self-efficacy beliefs. In contrast with mastery experiences, social persuasions, and vicarious experiences, which were cited most often as increasing self-efficacy, teachers almost always mentioned affective or physiological states when discussing experiences that lowered their self-efficacy. At the same time, descriptions of negative affective or physiological states were often intertwined with teachers’ assessments of their teaching (mastery experiences) or experiences receiving feedback from others (social persuasions). For a detailed discussion of our findings on the sources of self-efficacy, we invite readers to consult our recent article (Gale, Alemdar, Cappelli, & Morris, 2021).

Supporting Self-Efficacy: “I show up for the kids differently when I’m feeling supported.”

One thread that ran through teachers’ stories about their self-efficacy was the support they received (or did not receive) from members of their networks, which included other teachers, school administrators, university faculty, Noyce program staff, and their personal circles of family and friends. Beginning (first-year teachers), novice (2-3 years’ experience), and career teachers (4+ years’ experience) all identified support from other teachers more often than administrators, and beginning and novice teachers were especially likely to reference support from other teachers when describing factors that increased self-efficacy.

Although it was interesting to note patterns in who teachers of varying experience levels identified as supporters, we found that simply looking at the frequency with which teachers identify support from different sources didn’t tell the whole story. When we looked at the content of written responses and interview data, more nuanced stories about teacher support emerged. For example, we found that teachers particularly valued support from other teachers and administrators who “had their back” when working through difficult situations. In the following interview excerpt, one teacher described how a lack of support during difficult times can affect how she is able to “show up” for her students.

When the experiences are emotional and they leave me feeling vulnerable and unsupported, I definitely think I carry that into the classroom. And I think students notice. I don't think it affects my performance as a teacher to where I can't function, but I do think I show up for the kids differently when I'm feeling unsupported.

Similarly, as in the following example, a number of teachers described how emotional support from administrators and other teachers who were “in the same boat” helped them maintain confidence in spite of challenges.

I would say the biggest thing that has affected my confidence as a teacher in a positive way is having those trusting, safe, supportive adult relationships. In spite of the flaws that exist in my school, having administrators that I know care about me both as a teacher and as a person as well as having teammates who care about me and each other, both as professionals and as people, is number one in feeling like I can show up and effectively teach my students.

Interestingly, experienced teachers reflected both on recent events as well as formative episodes from their first years in the classroom. In both survey responses and interviews, experienced teachers recalled, sometimes in vivid detail, how interactions taking place early in their teaching careers influenced their confidence for years to come. Although teachers shared both particularly positive and negative early teaching experiences, descriptions of early negative experiences were more prevalent in the data. For example, one teacher with over 6 years of experience shared how an incident from his first year of teaching, in which an instructional coach required using teaching techniques that “did not mesh well” with his personality, lowered his confidence, adding that “it took me a long time to recover from the emotional toll this took on me.” The staying power of these early experiences reminds us that the messages teachers receive in the formative years of their careers can leave an indelible mark on their self-efficacy.

The Trustworthiness of Feedback: “When somebody like that says you’re good, you definitely appreciate it.”

Teachers often cited receiving positive or negative feedback on their teaching (social persuasions) as a factor influencing self-efficacy. However, just as Bandura (1997) theorized, not all feedback was considered equal when it came to its influence on self-efficacy. In fact, teachers were often discerning regarding which feedback they “took in” and which they disregarded. Teachers tended to trust feedback from colleagues or administrators with a similar background with regard to experience and subject-matter knowledge. Similarly, many teachers reported boosted confidence after receiving positive feedback from a mentor they admired. One teacher shared that he knew he had “figured this teaching thing out” when a veteran teacher he admired complimented his teaching, adding “when somebody like that says you’re good, you definitely appreciate it.” Conversely, teachers discounted “empty” praise or feedback based on what they perceived to be insufficient information. For example, one teacher shared,  “I trust feedback from people or coaches that have been regularly watching me, and I guess just been with me through a journey. I do not trust feedback from an observation that was five minutes long.”

Finally, many teachers highlighted feedback from students as some of the most meaningful feedback they receive. Several participants pointed out that because they spend the most time with teachers, students have more information on which to base their opinions than anyone else observing their teaching. Teachers’ descriptions of mastery experiences were replete with examples of students sharing feedback. Teachers knew they were successful not only because they thought a lesson went well, but also because their students told them so.

Based on our study, we can offer a few suggestions for fostering positive teaching self-efficacy along with implications for research design:

Celebrate Mastery Experiences
Self-efficacy beliefs are based largely on teachers’ own assessments of their performance. Coupling mastery experiences with feedback (social persuasions) from trusted colleagues seemed to reinforce teachers’ beliefs in their abilities. Thus, creating opportunities for teachers to share or model successful teaching practices, and establishing outlets for celebrating mastery experiences, may strengthen self-efficacy.
Teachers Consider the Source
Teachers filtered feedback depending on the perceived trustworthiness or credibility of the source. Feedback from sources they trusted informed their self-efficacy beliefs, either positively or negatively, whereas feedback from other sources had less influence. These findings suggest the importance of creating meaningful channels for teachers to receive feedback from those they trust and to reconsider feedback mechanisms that depend on sources teachers deem less trustworthy.
Going Beyond Measuring Self-Efficacy Levels
The field has learned much from research using validated self-efficacy instruments to measure levels of teacher self-efficacy. However, we argue that understanding how teachers’ experiences influence self-efficacy requires not only measurement of self-efficacy levels but also careful study of the sources.
Consider Depth vs. Breadth in Designing Self-Efficacy Studies
Our nationwide survey provided a breadth of information on Noyce teachers’ self-efficacy; however, the most revelatory self-efficacy data emerged through in-depth interviews with a smaller sample of Noyce teachers, where teachers could share stories related to their self-efficacy development. In designing interview protocols, we found it essential to ask about the sources of self-efficacy in many different ways and to include numerous probes and follow-up questions to fully explore the interconnections between teaching experiences and self-efficacy beliefs.

Closing

Teaching self-efficacy beliefs are complex, multi-faceted, and dynamic, making them a challenge for researchers to study and, perhaps to an even greater degree, for teacher educators to cultivate. Although our exploratory study does not provide definitive conclusions about best practices for cultivating self-efficacy, our study design featuring a multi-phase, mixed methods approach generated new insights into the sources of Noyce teachers’ self-efficacy. The interconnections among the sources described by teachers in our study suggests that mastery experiences may be most powerful in the context of a community of practice that provides a context for other sources of self-efficacy, such as receiving feedback from trusted colleagues (social persuasions) or observation of teaching in similar circumstances (vicarious experiences). Based on our experience with this study, we encourage researchers to consider going beyond simply measuring self-efficacy to use qualitative and mixed methods research designs that account for the complexity of self-efficacy beliefs. Future studies can add to our understanding of self-efficacy beliefs by further exploring how contextual factors and the types of support teachers receive influence appraisals of teaching ability and how the sources may have a differential impact over the course of teachers’ careers. Indeed, the narratives we gathered from teachers underscore the importance of scratching the surface of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs to take a look at the sources that lie beneath.

References

Aloe, A. M., Amo, L. C., & Shanahan, M. E. (2014). Classroom management self- efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0 

Anderson, R. N., Greene, M. L., & Loewen, P. S. (1988). Relationships among teachers' and students' thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 148-165.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001

Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001 

Gale, J., Alemdar, M., Cappelli, C., & Morris, D. (2021). A mixed methods study of self-efficacy, the sources of self-efficacy, and teaching experience. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.750599

Morris, D. B., Usher, E. L., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing the sources of teaching self-efficacy: A critical review of emerging literature. Educational Psychology Review, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.005

Webb, R. B., & Ashton, P. T. (1986). Teacher motivation and the conditions of teaching: A call for ecological reform. Journal of Thought, 21(2), 43-60.

Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers' sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 181-193.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181

Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90031-Y

Jessica Gale, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, Georgia Institute of Technology
jessica.gale@ceismc.gatech.edu

Jessica Gale is a Senior Research Scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on STEM integration, K-12 engineering, teacher self-efficacy, and the implementation of innovative STEM curricula.

,

Meltem Alemdar, Ph.D., Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist, Georgia Institute of Technology
meltem.alemdar@ceismc.gatech.edu

Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher education, and student learning in integrated STEM environments.

 

Filed Under: Blog

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive the:
  • newsletter,
  • blog,
  • webinars, and
  • announcements
to keep current on the latest ARISE happenings

SUBSCRIBE

Featured Post

Picture of sky with bursts of light
January 18, 2023
Teaching the Teacher: Social Justice, Equity, and the Future of Science
As we reflect on the past three years that embroiled Americans in a pandemic, which highlighted educational inequities and social justice issues, two looming questions arise. How will we utilize the lessons learned and our new awareness of individual and communal perseverance and resilience? Will we employ these lessons and new awareness to frame and... Read More

Past Posts

December 13, 2022
Let’s Stop Saying that Math is the Universal Language
Every math and science teacher of a certain age has seen it, probably multiple times. Many of us have shown it in our classes. It’s the scene from the movie Contact (Zemeckis, 1997) where the character played by Jodie Foster first hears from the aliens. It’s exciting, dramatic—the pulsing noise from space pushing through the... Read More
November 9, 2022
Productive Struggle: An Opportunity for In-Depth Mathematics Learning
Struggle is a regular part of mathematics class: students struggle to get started, to carry out a process, to express misconceptions and errors, and with “uncertainty in explaining and sense-making” (Warshauer, 2015, p. 385). We have been investigating the struggles of prospective mathematics teachers (PTs) in a middle school methods course (Kamlue & Van Zoest,... Read More

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE- 2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

ARISE is Brought to You by NSF and AAAS - The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About AAAS ARISE
  • AAAS ISEED
  •  
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  •  
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science